AI Act enforcement gets expert support: what changed in June 2026
The Commission appointed the Scientific Panel and Advisory Forum to support AI Act enforcement. Here is what this means for GPAI, systemic risk, high-risk classification…
The AI Act is not static. This hub tracks current law, the May 2026 political agreement, June enforcement support, draft high-risk guidance, Article 50 guidance, and timeline moves that change what companies should do next.
The Commission appointed the Scientific Panel and Advisory Forum to support AI Act enforcement. Here is what this means for GPAI, systemic risk, high-risk classification…
The Commission consulted on draft Article 50 transparency guidelines for interactive and generative AI systems. Feedback closed on 3 June 2026.
The Commission issued draft guidelines and examples for classifying high-risk AI systems, with feedback open until 23 June 2026.
A practical update for companies that still treat AI literacy as a future issue rather than a current operational obligation.
The March 2026 second draft, the Article 50 draft-guidelines consultation, and the actions providers and deployers can take before final guidance lands.
The Commission announced a political agreement on AI Act simplification, including proposed high-risk timing changes. Here is what is current law and what still needs fo…
What changed through the May 2026 Digital Omnibus political agreement, what is still not final law, and how teams should sequence readiness work.
A reminder page for teams that think all meaningful AI Act work starts in 2026. It does not for GPAI providers.
Every update page separates what is binding today, what is only proposed, what changed, and which practical action still makes sense even if dates move.
Use the free scanner to map your likely role, detect likely obligations, and see which evidence is missing.